CRI-13016647
Criminal case filed 2013-06-14. This page is assembled from the joined case endpoint and keeps source/context rows labeled separately.
Sections
| Section | What it contains | Rows | Open |
|---|---|---|---|
| People | Litigants, attorneys, judges, and other named appearances. | 3 | Open |
| Charges | Charge counts, statutes, severity, descriptions, and dispositions. | 7 | Open |
| Court events | Docket and hearing events with departments, dates, and judges. | 53 | Open |
| Outcomes | Outcome labels, categories, finality, dates, and basis rows. | 3 | Open |
| Prosecution context | DA action, arrest, filing, disposition, incident, and court-number context. | 3 | Open |
| Police incidents | Source-labeled police incident context linked to this case. | 3 | Open |
| Dispatch calls | Dispatch call rows linked through incident or case context. | 0 | Open |
| Documents | Civil portal document rows when present. | 0 | Open |
| Payments | Civil portal payment rows when present. | 0 | Open |
| Bail bonds | Bail bond rows linked to this case. | 0 | Open |
| Attorney candidates | Bar-search candidate matches for attorney names. | 2 | Open |
| Source records | Raw source records and provenance keys supporting the joined case. | 3 | Open |
| Enrichment edges | Join edges and confidence metadata connecting records. | 9 | Open |
Overview
| Case ID | 3,747,168 |
| Case number | CRI-13016647 |
| Division | criminal |
| Case type | - |
| Filed date | 2013-06-14 |
| Status | - |
| Named litigant | - |
| Events | 53 |
| Charges | 7 |
| Attorneys | 0 |
People
| Name | Role | Party Type | Attorney Type | Bar Number | Source ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLES BISESTO | attorney | - | District Attorney | - | - |
| JENNIFER NORYKO | attorney | - | Public Defender | - | - |
| EUGENE LEDBETTER | defendant | - | - | - | - |
Charges
| Count | Statute | Code | Severity | Description | Disposition | Source ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 243(e)(1) | PC | M | BATTERY | - | - |
| 1 | 243(e)(1) | PC | - | DA booked charge token | Charges Filed | - |
| 1 | 243(e)(1) | PC | M | DA filed charge token | Acquittal | - |
| 1 | 243(e)(1) | PC | M | DA resolution charge token | Finding - Not Guilty | - |
| 2 | 487(a) | PC | M | GRAND THEFT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY | - | - |
| 2 | 487(a) | PC | M | DA filed charge token | Acquittal | - |
| 2 | 487(a) | PC | M | DA resolution charge token | Finding - Not Guilty | - |
Recent court events
| Date | Event Type | Department | Judge Name | Description | Source ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-02-17 | docket | - | - | /X:DANIEL ZARCHY, CERTIFIED LAW STUDENT APPEARED FOR THE PEOPLE, UNDER THESUPERVISION BY ADA BRINGARDNER/NP/X:DEFENSE ATTORNEY IS NOT PRESENT/CTORD:MATTER OFF CALENDAR FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON: MOVING PARTY IS NOT PRESENT | - |
| 2015-02-17 | hearing | Department 18 | - | PC 851.8 Petition for Factual Innocence | - |
| 2014-12-17 | docket | - | - | /CAL:DEF 851,8PC PETITION HEARNG/NP/CONTD:SAME, PER DEFENSE'S REQUEST/ | - |
| 2014-12-17 | hearing | Department 18 | - | PC 851.8 Petition for Factual Innocence | - |
| 2014-12-16 | docket | - | - | DEFT'S MOT TO CONTINUE (PC851,8 PETITION HRG) FILED AT INSISTENCE | - |
| 2014-12-10 | docket | - | - | DA'S OPP TO PETITNRS PC851,8 MOTION FILED | - |
| 2014-11-17 | docket | - | - | /CAL:PC 851,8 MOTION (ARREST DATE 061313) /CONTD:HEARING (1,5 HOURS ESTIMATE)/ | - |
| 2014-11-17 | hearing | Department 18 | - | PC 851.8 Petition for Factual Innocence | - |
| 2014-11-13 | docket | - | - | /CAL:DEFENSE'S 851,8PC PETITION (ARREST DATE 061313)/NP/X:DEFENSE COUNSELIS NOT PRESENT/CONTD:SAME, PER DEFENSE COUNSEL'S REQUEST VIA PHONE/ | - |
| 2014-11-13 | hearing | Department 18 | - | PC 851.8 Petition for Factual Innocence | - |
| 2014-10-22 | docket | - | - | DEFT'S PC851,8 PETITION FOR FACTUAL INNOCENCE FINDING FILED | - |
| 2013-08-30 | docket | - | - | /CAL: SPECIAL EVIDENTIARY HRG RE RET OF PROPERTY & DEFENSE'S MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY/DAWT/X: NEITHER THE PEOPLE NOR THE DEFENSE WISHES TO PRESENT FURTHER EVIDENCE,/X: THE MATTER IS SUBMITTED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTEDAT TRIAL,/X: AFTER ARGUMENT, THE COURT FINDS THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE PROVENBY PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE, THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT ENTITLED TO LAWFULLY POSSESS THE PURSE, AND THAT MS, COMBS WAS ENTITLED TO LAWFULLY POSSESS THE PURSE,/X: THE HANDBAG IS RELEASED TO THE PEOPLE IN OPEN COURT,/ | - |
Outcomes
| Date | Outcome Category | Outcome Label | Finality | Basis | Source ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-07-22 | acquitted | Finding - Not Guilty | final | da_status_fields; source-labeled SFDA context, subordinate to court docket facts | sfda_case_resolutions |
| 2013-06-13 | acquitted | Acquittal | final | da_status_fields; source-labeled SFDA context, subordinate to court docket facts | sfda_prosecuted_cases |
| 2013-06-13 | filed | Charges Filed | nonfinal | da_status_fields; source-labeled SFDA context, subordinate to court docket facts | sfda_arrests |
Full case record
| Case ID | 3,747,168 |
| Case Number | CRI-13016647 |
| Division | criminal |
| Case Type | - |
| Title | - |
| Filed Date | 2013-06-14 |
| Status | - |
| Source Record Ids | - |
Get this page with API
Rendered from the bluedoor SF Superior Court API. Reproduce it:
GET https://api.bluedoor.sh/sf-superior-court/v1/cases/3747168JSON