bluedoor data·SF Superior Court API·bluedoor.sh ↗

HomeCasesCRI-02403206

CRI-02403206

Criminal case filed 2009-01-23. This page is assembled from the joined case endpoint and keeps source/context rows labeled separately.

Sections

SectionWhat it containsRowsOpen
PeopleLitigants, attorneys, judges, and other named appearances.3Open
ChargesCharge counts, statutes, severity, descriptions, and dispositions.4Open
Court eventsDocket and hearing events with departments, dates, and judges.65Open
OutcomesOutcome labels, categories, finality, dates, and basis rows.0Open
Prosecution contextDA action, arrest, filing, disposition, incident, and court-number context.0Open
Police incidentsSource-labeled police incident context linked to this case.0Open
Dispatch callsDispatch call rows linked through incident or case context.0Open
DocumentsCivil portal document rows when present.0Open
PaymentsCivil portal payment rows when present.0Open
Bail bondsBail bond rows linked to this case.0Open
Attorney candidatesBar-search candidate matches for attorney names.2Open
Source recordsRaw source records and provenance keys supporting the joined case.0Open
Enrichment edgesJoin edges and confidence metadata connecting records.0Open

Overview

Case ID3,510,866
Case numberCRI-02403206
Divisioncriminal
Case type-
Filed date2009-01-23
StatusSentencing Observed
Named litigant-
Events65
Charges4
Attorneys0

People

NameRoleParty TypeAttorney TypeBar NumberSource ID
RICHARD SHIKMANattorney-Conflict Attorney--
SHARON REARDONattorney-District Attorney--
MARK BUZAdefendant----

Charges

CountStatuteCodeSeverityDescriptionDispositionSource ID
1451(d)PCFARSON OF PROPERTY OF ANOTHER--
2453(a)PCFPOSSESSION OR MANUFACTURE OF COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL OR INCENDIARY DEVICE--
3594(b)(1)PCFVANDALISM MORE THAN $400--
4298.1(a)PCMREFUSAL OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SPECIMEN--

Recent court events

DateEvent TypeDepartmentJudge NameDescriptionSource ID
2019-04-24docket--APP,ORD & RECEIPT FOR REL OF PPL'S EXHIBITS TO DA INSP MAURA DUFFY FILED-
2019-01-11docket--SIGNED BLANKET, APP & ORD RE; DISPOSAL OF EXHIBITS FILED-
2018-06-04docket--/CAL:HEARING TO READ REMITTITUR ONTO THE RECORD/X:COURT STATED THE BACKGROUND ON THIS CASE/X:THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL HAD PREVIOUSLY REVERSEDTHE TRIAL COURT/X:THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT THEN REVERSED THE COURT OFAPPEAL'S REVERSAL OF THE TRIAL CORT/X:THE RULING OF THE OF THE CALIFORNIASUPREME COURT IN EFFECT AFFIRMED THE JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT/X:NO FURTHER ACTION NEEDS TO BE TAKEN/TEXT:JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; REMITTITUR SPREAD UPON MINUTES/-
2018-06-04hearingDepartment 28-Hearing-
2018-05-25docket--REMITTITUR FILED; COURT OF APPEAL CONFIRMS CA SUPREME CT REVERSAL-
2009-07-09docket--DFT FEL NOT APPEAL FILED-
2009-07-06docket--/CAL FELONY SENTENCING/X DEFENSE MOVES TO PREVENT COURT FROM PRONOUNCINGUDGMENT ON COUNT 4 FOR UNCONSTITUTIONALITY REASONS; MATTER IS ARGUED AND SUBMITTED,/X:COURT DENIES DEFENSE MOTION AND PROCEEDS ON JUDGMENT,/X:DEFENSE MOTION FOR PROBATION AND COUNSELLING IS DENIED BY THE COURT, REASONS ARESTATED ON THE RECORD,/AJW/DNACOMP/SCC3:1 & 2/X:SENTENCE FOR COUNT 1:/CH1:SP 16 M:L/CTSP:167/STATES/VF5:200/SECFEE/ICNA/X:SENTENCE FOR COUNT 2://CH2:SP 16 M:L/CTSP:167/STATES/VF5:200/SECFEE/ICNA/654:3/X:SENTENCE FOR COUNT 3:/CH3:SP 16 M:L/CTSP:167/STATES/CTORD:THESE FOLLOWING FINES FOR COUNT 3 ARE STAYED: $200 RESTITUTION FINE PURSUANT TO PC 1202,4; $20 COURT SECURITY FEE; AND $30 IMMEDIATE CRITICAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT FEE/PAR/APPEAL/CTORD:THAT DEFENDANT MUST REGISTER AS ARSON OFFENDER PURSUANT TO PC 457,1/CDC//SCC3:1 & 4/X:SENTENCE FOR COUNT 4:/TWS/CH4:CJ 6 M/CTS:167/VF1/SECFEE/ICNA/COLLECT/CTORD:THAT ZERO RESTITUTION BE SET IN THIS CASE; BUT JURISDICTION WILL BE RETAINED FOR ANY FUTURE RESTITUTION MATTERS/X:COURT FINDS THAT THE DEFENDANT IS NOT ABLE TO PAY FOR THE SERVICES OF LEGAL COUNSEL, PURSUANTTO PC 987,8,/-
2009-07-06hearingDepartment 17-Sentencing Hearing-
2009-06-29docket--/CAL:SENTENCING/CONTD:SENTENCING/DOP/-
2009-06-29hearingDepartment 17-Sentencing Hearing-
2009-06-09docket--/CAL:MARSDEN HEARING/ARG&SUB/MO DENIED/X:COURT FINDS GOOD CAUSE TO CONTINUE SENTENCING,/X:COURT DIRECT THAT DNA SAMPLE BE COLLECTED BY S,F, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT PURSUANT 296 PC, THE S,F, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT MAY USE REASONABLE FORCE AS OUTLINED IN P,C, SECTION 298,1,/CONTD:SENTENCING/-
2009-06-09hearingDepartment 17-Sentencing Hearing-

Outcomes

DateOutcome CategoryOutcome LabelFinalityBasisSource ID
No matching rows.

Full case record

Case ID3,510,866
Case NumberCRI-02403206
Divisioncriminal
Case Type-
Title-
Filed Date2009-01-23
Statussentencing_observed
Source Record Ids-
Get this page with API

Rendered from the bluedoor SF Superior Court API. Reproduce it:

GET https://api.bluedoor.sh/sf-superior-court/v1/cases/3510866JSON